Obama brings Medicare duel to Granite State
August 18th, 2012
03:58 PM ET

Obama brings Medicare duel to Granite State

Windham, New Hampshire (CNN) – Following a week of dueling Medicare ads, President Barack Obama traveled to the swing state of New Hampshire Saturday to drive home the point that he and his Republican challengers have very different views on how to save the health care program.

"You'd think they'd avoid talking about Medicare given the fact that both of them have proposed to voucherize the Medicare system, but I guess they figure the best defense is to try to go on offense," he said.


In a crowded high school gym in southern New Hampshire – one of the eight states that CNN rates as a November toss-up – the president touted his own administration record on Medicare.

"Since I've been in office I've strengthened Medicare." he said. "I've made reforms that have extended the life of the program, that have saved millions of seniors with Medicare hundreds of dollars on their prescription drugs. The only changes to your benefits that I've made on Medicare is that Medicare now covers new preventive services like cancer screenings and wellness visits for free."

In contrast, Obama argued, his opponents' plan would force seniors to pay an extra $6400 a year for their health care "so they can give another tax cut to millionaires and billionaires."

Meanwhile, Republican vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan was in another battleground, Florida, speaking on Medicare in the country's largest retirement community.

"Medicare was there for our family, for my grandma when we needed it. Medicare is here for my mom when she needs it now and we have to keep that guarantee," he said after introducing his mother, who joined him at the event. "She planned her retirement based around this promise that the government made her because she paid her payroll taxes into this program that she had this promise with. That's a promise we have to keep."

He also returned the volley of criticism, charging that Obama "raids $716 billion dollars from the Medicare program to pay for the Obamacare program." The independent fact checker Politifact.com has rated this charge "mostly false," pointing out the amount is projected future spending reductions reached through cutting payments to providers.

Beyond the campaign trail, the campaigns exchanged blows over Medicare this week in television advertisements. Three days after a Romney campaign ad warned seniors, "You paid in to Medicare for years… Now, when you need it, Obama has cut $716 billion dollars from Medicare," Obama rebutted with an ad urging voters to "get the facts." A Romney spokeswoman replied that the Obama ad "gets the facts wrong."

New Hampshire and its four electoral votes are getting plenty of attention this election cycle. President Obama has already been to the state three times this year. Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan will campaign together in the state on Monday.

A WMUR Granite State Poll released Monday shows Obama and Romney in a neck and neck race in New Hampshire: 49% of likely voters favor Obama and 46% support Romney, a margin well within the poll's sampling error.

– CNN's Gregory Wallace contributed to this report


soundoff (47 Responses)
  1. bb

    Its good oblunder suggest getting facts. Heres one Oblunder said wouldnt run agin if unemp over 6%, wouldnt run if didnt cut deficet in half, ill close gitmo, THESE ARE FACTS MAN UP oblunder and get out u have done enough damge to America

    August 18, 2012 at 4:17 pm |
    • Best for America

      Sorry it's impossible to take any comment seriously when the writer can't even correctly spell the name of the President of the United states who only has 5 letters in his name and has been in office for more than three years. If the writer of this comment had read any news paper, magazine or watched any news report spelling OBAMA would not be a problem. It's even in the title of this article. If the writer was just trying to be cute, and show total disrespect for the Office of the President you succeeded. But this reflects badly on you, just the opposite of what you were trying to accomplish.

      August 18, 2012 at 9:20 pm |
      • Howard

        Newsweek magazine is targeting its latest controversial cover at the Obama administration. It’s part of a devastating story written by esteemed British historian Niall Ferguson telling President Obama that it’s time to go and that the only team that can possibly turn the country around is the Romney-Ryan ticket.

        “In his inaugural address, Obama promised ‘not only to create new jobs, but to lay a new foundation for growth.’” Ferguson writes in the cover story, “Hit the Road, Barack: Why We Need a New President.”

        “He promised to ‘build the roads and bridges, the electric grids, and digital lines that feed our commerce and bind us together.’ He promised to ‘restore science to its rightful place and wield technology’s wonders to raise health care’s quality and lower its cost.’” wrote Ferguson, who made some of the same arguments in a March 2012 Newsmax cover story, "Decision Time." “And he promised to ‘transform our schools and colleges and universities to meet the demands of a new age.’ Unfortunately the president’s scorecard on every single one of those bold pledges is pitiful.”

        “Welcome to Obama’s America: nearly half the population is not represented on a taxable return—almost exactly the same proportion that lives in a household where at least one member receives some type of government benefit,” Ferguson writes. “We are becoming the 50–50 nation—half of us paying the taxes, the other half receiving the benefits.”

        August 20, 2012 at 1:31 pm |
    • tomclements

      Here is proof that Obama has no clue. The last "tax cut" for the middle class actually was a halt on paying social security. Social security is the funding mechanism of medicare. How is this strengthening medicare?

      August 20, 2012 at 9:08 am |
  2. Estaban

    Gotta love the teleprompters.

    I lost track on how many time the word "I" was used.

    August 18, 2012 at 5:07 pm |
  3. jr

    The people have always some champion whom they set over them and nurse
    into greatness.

    Yes, that is their way.
    This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he
    first appears above ground he is a protector.

    Yes, that is quite clear.
    How then does a protector begin to change into a tyrant? Clearly when
    he does what the man is said to do in the tale of the Arcadian temple
    of Lycaean Zeus.

    What tale?
    The tale is that he who has tasted the entrails of a single human
    victim minced up with the entrails of other victims is destined to
    become a wolf. Did you never hear it?

    Oh, yes.
    And the protector of the people is like him; having a mob entirely
    at his disposal, he is not restrained from shedding the blood of kinsmen;
    by the favourite method of false accusation he brings them into court
    and murders them, making the life of man to disappear, and with unholy
    tongue and lips tasting the blood of his fellow citizen; some he kills
    and others he banishes, at the same time hinting at the abolition
    of debts and partition of lands: and after this, what will be his
    destiny? Must he not either perish at the hands of his enemies, or
    from being a man become a wolf –that is, a tyrant?

    Inevitably.
    This, I said, is he who begins to make a party against the rich?
    Plato

    August 18, 2012 at 5:31 pm |
    • Cynthia L.

      Let me guess, you work on Wall Street.

      August 20, 2012 at 4:24 pm |
  4. Jinx88

    "Ryan family business, which goes back generations, has been built to a large extent on government contracts." So I guess with Ryan wanting smaller government those government contracts will go bye bye right Mr. Ryan? I guess not cause like everyother Repug they only want government when it benefits them. Pathetic!!

    August 18, 2012 at 5:32 pm |
  5. Lizzie

    bb, when have democrats EVER done what they promised.

    August 18, 2012 at 6:03 pm |
    • Best for America

      You maybe just a little confused. If you knew anything about history or politics you would already know the answer to that question. It's always a good idea to have some idea what you are talking about before you open your mouth. True freedom of speech is a heavy responsibility. Try using it wisely.

      August 18, 2012 at 9:29 pm |
    • Cynthia L.

      Early on in the Afghanistan war, when we first went after al Qeada after 9-11, our BRAVE SOLDIERS FOUND OUT where Osama bin-Laden was hiding THEY ASKED FOR PERMISSION from George Bush to go after him. BUSH pulled them out and sent them to Iraq (a country that had nothing to do with the 9-11 attack.) Years into the two wars, a reporter once again asked Bush where Osama bin-Laden was. Bush just shrugged, while lazily leaning on his podium saying, "I don't know where the man is, I really don't think much about guy, He's probably just hangin' out in a cave somewhere" What the f**k? Did that kinda make you mad? - IT MADE ME FURIOUS.
      During his run for President the first time, Obama promised he would use the good work of the people on the ground, make sure the intelligence sources were working together to find Osama bin-Laden and let our MILITARY do what they first set out to do. GET THE GUY.
      When intelligence came that there was a good chance, even though it wasn't crystal-clear, that they found bin-Laden, Obama and his team and Navy Admiral William McRaven(who oversees the Seals) and other intelligence officers pulled together, came up with a strategy, Obama taking the risk to shoulder all blame if it didn't go smoothly and willing to risk Universal condemnation from our allies for invading Pakistani territory, SAID GO.
      WHEN AMERICA HEARD THE NEWS that Osama bin-Laden was killed WE DANCED IN THE STREETS.

      THANK YOU MR. PRESIDENT! THANK YOU AMERICAN MILITARY!! HOO-AHH!!

      Now Lizzie, so sad that you think this wasn't a promise kept. But, since your name is on it, guess we all understand why you don't care about facts.

      August 19, 2012 at 11:29 am |
  6. Howard

    Obama, and his corrupt supporters have already been exposed as liars. Now, he's trying to B.S. the good people of the Granite State. He'll do, or say anything to hold onto power.
    Save America ... Dump Obama in 2012 !!!

    August 18, 2012 at 6:37 pm |
    • Best for America

      Oh! Look who is back. So all the millions of Obama supporters are corrupt? It's more likely that posters who make all inclusive statements are corrupt. Unless you have been very busy you can't possibly have met ALL Obama supporters. So how can you make such a flat statement about people you do not even know. But then truth and honesty are not a common trend in most of your posts.

      August 18, 2012 at 9:37 pm |
      • Howard

        People who enable, maintain, support, and defend a leader who is disrespecting the constitution he has sworn to uphold and defend ... a leader who breaks most of his campaign promises ... a leader who has virtually destroyed America's economy ... are just as bad, and just as the corrupt leader they keep in power.

        August 19, 2012 at 1:56 am |
      • Frank Marshall Davis

        Nor are they of yours, just admit you're a hardcore Obama supporter.

        August 19, 2012 at 6:35 am |
      • Howard

        Obama has looted over 700 BILLION dollars from Medicare, to fund his corrupt, pork laden, TRILLION dollar Obamacare monstrosity. It's time to throw this charlatan out of the White House, and replace him with someone who sincerely cares about America and our consitution, more than holding onto his own power at all costs.

        August 19, 2012 at 12:31 pm |
      • Howard

        Oh, look who doesn't have America's back ... it's the PEST OF AMERICA, People who enable, maintain, support, and defend a leader who is disrespecting the constitution he has sworn to uphold and defend ... a leader who breaks most of his campaign promises ... a leader who has virtually destroyed America's economy ... are just as bad, and just as the corrupt leader they keep in power.

        August 19, 2012 at 12:36 pm |
      • Howard

        Best For America ??? ... more like PEST OF AMERICA !!!

        August 19, 2012 at 12:37 pm |
    • Iamnotfooled

      They are lying about coal production. Between 2008-2011 More coal jobs.
      They are lying about the Welfare No Work Requirement
      They are lying about the Military only voting in Ohio- Obama wants all Ohioans to be able to vote early
      Ryan lied about a GM plant closing in Janesville , Wisconsin his home town. It closed in Dec. 2008 under Bush.
      Stimulus-He Ryan–said he never asked for stimulus and he got 21 million for 2 co's in Wisconsin.

      August 19, 2012 at 6:00 am |
      • Lizzie

        Right, massages, walking, reading, doing errands for a friend are just a few of the WORK requirements to receive welfare. But he has to expand welfare payment, now that unemployment insurance after 2 years has run out for a lot of people.

        August 19, 2012 at 12:08 pm |
      • daveyoung

        Without lies, there would be no politicians

        August 20, 2012 at 4:13 pm |
  7. naksuthin

    You cannot be be a TRUE conservative and favor Medicare. Medicare is against everything conservative stand for
    1. Medicare is a socialist government program.
    2. It was started by the same President that gave us the "great welfare society".... Democrat Lyndon B. Johnson

    In Medicare.....
    1. The GOVERNMENT forces every worker to pay into the system by forcibly taking money out of every paycheck whether they like it or not
    2, The GOVERNMENT uses the money to pay for healthcare for CURRENT senior citizens (not into your own personal account )
    If you die BEFORE you turn 65...neither you nor your heirs will see a penny from your lifelong contributions
    3. When a hospital or doctor treats a senior, they send their bill to the federal GOVERNMENT
    4. The government decides how much of the bill they want to pay and sends a check to the doctor or hospital.

    THAT IS SOCIALISM in a nutshell

    Romney and Ryan understand this.
    They want to take the government out of the job of providing health care services and let seniors buy their own health insurance from private for profit insurance companies.
    Seniors will buy health insurance just like the rest of Americans. From private companies

    Medicare is nothing more than a government SOCIALISM FOR SENIOR CITIZENS

    August 18, 2012 at 7:38 pm |
    • Best for America

      so I guess this is why according to this article Rep Ryan's family has spent two generations using this social program. I guess this means that Ryan's family has for generations practiced what you call Socialism. If you have ever been laid off and tried to purchase insurance you might have a clearer picture. If you know anything about the cost of life insurance as you age, you would know that a 70 year old pays 5 times the amount a 30 year old would pay for the same coverage. Of course this is due to likely cost of insuring and older person. If you think this same principle will not apply to health insurance, trying calling any insurance company and finding a policy for a person 65 or older. If Ryan and Romney will quarantee the actual cost of the insurance that would be a different story. When I was laid off because of a plant closing, I looked into health insurance, COBRA, and I could not afford it and I was just 35. So you see why I have no faith in a voucher system. What good would a voucher be if you cannot buy coverage. Most Americans do not buy insurance directly from for profit companies. They participate in group policies, which are purchased at group rates by corporations. Are you saying a senior buying insurance with a voucher will be getting a better deal as an individual from a for profit company?

      August 18, 2012 at 9:55 pm |
      • Howard

        Your deceptive, dishonest, disingenuous name, Best for America, makes you a dirty liar ... just like Obama, Reid, and Pelosi.

        August 19, 2012 at 1:58 am |
      • Iamnotfooled

        @Howard-Usually when people resort to name calling it's because the truth hurts. You sound ignorant.

        August 19, 2012 at 5:43 am |
  8. DEcember 2012

    OBAMA IS GOING TO WIPE THE FLOOR WITH THAT MOMMA'S BOY. COME ON, LET'S TALK ABOUT MEDICARE AND FLORIDA IS AS GOOD AS BLUE.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

    August 18, 2012 at 11:02 pm |
    • Howard

      For the past 3 1/2 years, Obama has been wiping the floor with America's constitution, rights, traditions, and economy. Obama is destroying America, and by supporting this traitor, fools like you have been helping him do it.

      To respond to you in a language you understand ... HE – HAW – HE – HAW – HE – HAW !!!

      August 19, 2012 at 2:03 am |
      • DEcember 2012

        GET A CLUE HOWARD. THANKS TO FORWARD THINKING AMERICANS LIKE OBAMA, WE WILL NO LONGER BE MIRED IN THE OLD AGE 'TRADITIONS' OF SLAVERY OF NOT ONLY TO RACIAL BIGOTRY BUT ALSO TO CORPORATE GREED. THE CONSTITUTION WAS WRITTEN NOT HOLD BACK AMERICANS TO THE PAST BUT TO LEAD THEM TO A BETTER FUTURE.

        August 20, 2012 at 2:52 pm |
    • DEcember 2012

      GET A CLUE HOWARD. THANKS TO FORWARD THINKING AMERICANS LIKE OBAMA, WE WOULD STILL BE MIRED IN THE OLD AGE TRADITIONS OF SLAVERY OF NOT ONLY TO RACIAL BIGOTRY BUT ALSO TO CORPORATE GREED. THE CONSTITUTION WAS WRITTEN NOT HOLD BACK AMERICANS TO THE PAST BUT TO LEAD THEM TO A BETTER FUTURE.

      August 20, 2012 at 2:49 pm |
  9. Iamnotfooled

    Naksuthin– you are a prime example of a Republican who types before he thinks. Did you read the article? Your hero Paul Ryan's mother is on Medicare. LOL.

    August 19, 2012 at 5:47 am |
  10. Frank Marshall Davis

    Romney has said over and over that it will be his medicare plan, not Ryan's that he will use. Continually harping on the Ryan plan, which didn't pass the Senate anyway is a strawman argument. Let's say Obamacare never gets repealed, Medicare still has trillions in unfunded future costs and must be dealt with eventually or it will collapse, it's as simple as that. Most young people now don't believe it will even be around when they retire. All this debt needs to be dealt with and raising taxes won't even put a dent in it. I've yet to hear Obama's plan.

    August 19, 2012 at 6:44 am |
    • DEcember 2012

      WHAT IS THAT PLAN I WONDER? HE CAN'T SEEM TO GET INTO THE DETAILS. WHEN HE PICKED RYAN, HE ALSO PICKED UP HIS BAGGAGE. THAT INCLUDES THE RYAN BUDGET. GET OVER IT.

      OBAMA HAS MANAGED TO KEEP MEDICARE ALIVE FOR 8 MORE YEARS. IT IS TIME TO TALK ABOUT FIXING IT WITH REAL SOLUTIONS BUT IT IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN UNTIL AFTER THE ELECTIONS. AND NO, VOUCHERS AND TAX CUTS FOR MILLIONAIRES IS NOT REALLY A SOLUTION THAT WILL BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY, JUST LIKE 'PUTTING SOCIAL SECURITY ON THE STOCK MARKET' IDEA. IF YOU WANT TO SERIOUSLY CUT GOVERNMENT SPENDING, EVERYTHING HAS TO BE ON THE TABLE. NOT JUST WHAT HAPPENS TO BE POLITICALLY ADVANTAGEOUS TO YOUR PARTY.

      August 19, 2012 at 9:41 am |
      • Howard

        OBAMA HAS LOOTED OVER 700 BILLION DOLLARS FROM MEDICARE, TO FUND HIS CORRUPT, PORK LADEN, TRILLION DOLLAR OBAMACARE MONSTROSITY ... WHICH WAS RUSHED THROUGH A VOTE ... BEHIND CLOSED DOORS ... AND PASSED BY IRRESPONSIBLE POLITICIANS, WHO NEVER EVEN READ IT !!!

        August 19, 2012 at 12:41 pm |
  11. Ray E. (Georgia)

    Oh boy,
    Here we go again. All the Social Programs, invented, put in place by Democrats, are Unconstutitional. Even worse all of them are running out of money.And like it or not unemployment is high because most business isn't hiring because of what they face after "Obamacare" kicks in. Socalisim is an abject failure and has failed everywhere it has been tried. Look at the Ols Soviet Union. Look at Greece. Look at California. Looik at most States who's budget's are deep in the red. Look at the U.S. borrowing 40 cents of every dollar they spend. All because of big democrat liberal programs. People need jobs. They don't need a big social medical program. It is time to end all social programs in the federal government. if the states want to continue them they are free to do so.

    August 19, 2012 at 6:48 am |
  12. november2012

    sad time when a sitting president has to result to a dirty campaign to hold on to power....making an issue out of Mitt's tax returns...when we all know if Mitt did anything illegal it would be all over the press and especially cnn....a very thin attack, if this is all obama has he deserves to crawl back into the chicago sewer.

    August 19, 2012 at 11:31 am |
  13. viranka

    @cheddar888 – i am on SS and you are a youngster who has no clue about SS facts. if you can't do the homework and get the facts you should SHUT THE F*** UP!!! your numbers are bogus pulled out of thin air. of course i expect nothing less from a generation y airhead!

    August 19, 2012 at 2:17 pm |
  14. Peg

    I do not understand why Romney & Ryan want to gut and fundamentally change SS and Medicare – the only part of the federal government that has been running surpluses for decades – sure they now need some tweaking to stay solvent over the next few decades – but they have served seniors well – seniors like them – the trust funds have also been running surpluses and still are.

    All we have to do to save these programs that will only begin to show some shortfalls (not bankrupt) in the next 10-20 years, is raise trust funds revenues a very small amount and make modest changes in order to keep them alive for decades to come.

    Why would we get rid of a program that has been doing its job and NOT adding to deficits? Surpluses do not add to deficits, in fact, the trust fund surpluses have been used to offset the appearance of the federal funds deficits for decades. The increasing trust fund revenues have also been used to hide the true impact that the Republican tax cuts have had on the federal funds revenues as well.

    For example in 2008 the federal funds deficit was 724 billion, but the trust funds surplus was 266 billion, so they reported a total deficit of 458 billion. This is the only thing the republican tax cuts have not caused huge deficits in – yet – SS and medicare.

    In fact, if you look at the Bush tax cuts and the Reagan tax cuts and look at the "federal funds revenues" They drop a huge amount after the tax cuts and this lasts, until GDP growth eventually makes up for it (A GDP that grew just as fast with higher tax rates under Clinton). The only thing that has made the immediate impact of these Republican tax cuts less noticeable, was that the trust fund revenue increases (population growth, etc) have made up for the declining federal funds revenues, and the Republicans have pointed to this and have said "look, total revenues did not decline with our tax cuts." Yes – they did – it is right there in black and white, if you look at federal funds revenues.

    I guess now that the trust fund surpluses are shrinking and now do not serve them a purpose to hide the impact of their tax cuts on federal funds, or to hide the huge federal funds deficits they have been creating, they have no more use for the trust funds, except to cut costs enough that they can once again raid these revenues to offset what they have really been doing to our federal deficits and revenues.

    The only way for them to still hide the real costs of their tax cuts for the wealthy is to revamp and gut SS and Medicare, so they can use the surpluses to, once again, hide the additional tax cuts they want to give themselves.

    Because lets face it, if Romney's plan is to be revenue neutral when we are at record lows of revenue to GDP, and since he also plans to increase defense spending, by 2.1 trillion over the next ten years, the only way to begin to balance the budget, even in the long run, is by gutting these programs, and many others average Americans count on, and use these trust fund revenues to once again offset the appearance of the deficits they create.

    Essentially, they are planning to gut medicare and SS so they can use this largely low income and middle class source of revenue to allow themselves (the wealthy) another huge tax break and as a way to hide the impact of all of this on our deficits and revenues (yet once again).

    It really is Robin Hood in reverse.

    In addition, Mark Hopkins, a senior adviser at Moody's Analytics said "If we implemented all of his (Romney's) policies, it would push us deeper into recession and make the recovery slower." and " "On net, all of these policies would do more harm in the short term" Also according to the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), Paul Ryan's budget, that Romeny supports and calls "an excellent piece of work," would reduce jobs by 4.1 million through 2014. Yes – reduce

    August 19, 2012 at 3:47 pm |
    • jerrylax

      medicare becomes in solvent in three years....medicaid is and always has been a fiscal mess. Private insured plans have always wworked...until the social programs destroyed the system. A little study here might be good for you.

      August 20, 2012 at 3:38 pm |
  15. Latina/diana

    People have no choice about their health insurance because once you turn 65 you are place on Medicare whether you like it or not. You don't get the care you once had before you turn 65. Also our politicians don't have to worry about their health care because they are taken care of for the rest of their lives at taxpayer expense. Is Osama's mother-n-law on medicare probably not she is taken care by the president and Aunt Esther(michellie) at our expense. You have not heard her campaigning about medicare because Osama is going to keep her out don't want anybody to know. Osama is a tru idiot. Yea Mitt/Ryan2012!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    August 19, 2012 at 4:17 pm |
    • Cynthia L.

      Hi, Howard, you forgot to cover your five 0'clock shadow. You make one ugly girl.

      August 20, 2012 at 4:29 pm |
  16. Ingrid

    How to fix Medicare: Any senior with a pension and medical insurance who paid by monthly premiums should NOT have to be enrolled in Medicare. At age 65, your health insurance makes you enroll in plan A+B medicare and the health insurance you paid monthly premiums for becomes secondary and you keep on paying the same premiums every month that you have paid for years, and Medicare becomes primary? Why is this? Fix it! DUH!!

    August 19, 2012 at 7:23 pm |
  17. november2012

    medicare duel....he stole $716,000,000,000.00 from medicare and has twisted all the facts pertaining to obamacare....there is no duel...obama is not in the game and soon will be back in the sewer he crawled out of.

    August 20, 2012 at 12:17 am |
    • DEcember 2012

      HE TOOK THAT MONEY AND MADE MEDICARE BETTER BY APPLYING SOME OF THE GREAT CHANGES FROM THE ACA LIKE PREVENTATIVE CARE AND SAVING MONEY BY CUTTING THE OVER-PAYMENTS MADE TO PROVIDERS. GET A CLUE.

      August 20, 2012 at 2:45 pm |
      • jerrylax

        HE, the idiot-in-chief, applied that money to MEDICAID...the program working Americans pay for that is driving this country off the fiscal cliff. You see it is the hard working lower middle class who is getting slammed here. Just too bad many of you are too ill informed to see this (a good way to say 'ignorant').

        August 20, 2012 at 3:35 pm |
  18. daveyoung

    " I will gladly give you a rationed "healthcareburger" tomorrow for a campaign dollar today" sez the Wimpy Prezzident

    August 20, 2012 at 4:12 pm |
  19. Jailtime

    The Romney Medicare Voucher Plan will become the Romney/Ryan Medicare Vulture Plan. Big tax cuts for the wealthy and piece of scrap paper for those under 55 today. Under their proposal, the plan goes broke by 2016.

    August 20, 2012 at 4:47 pm |
  20. info sehat

    I've been exploring for a bit for any high quality articles or blog posts in this sort of house . Exploring in Yahoo I finally stumbled upon this site. Reading this info So i am glad to express that I've a very good uncanny feeling I found out just what I needed. I such a lot surely will make sure to don?t fail to remember this site and give it a glance on a relentless basis.

    August 21, 2012 at 2:35 pm |